Tuesday 27th November
In
the morning we went back to site and surveyed the situation. The tanks now had had the following volumes
of sludge put into them:
1
– Filter bed with metal roof: 580L
2
– Filter bed with plastic roof: 510L
3
– Filter bed with thatch roof: 560L
4
– Flat bed with metal roof: 490L
5
– Flat bed with plastic roof: 490L
6
– Flat bed with thatch roof: 490L
The
reason for the differences is the assortment of containers the material was
delivered in.
We
took the roofs off while I prepared the sampling materials. We had screw top plastic jars, plastic
spoons, and gloves. I labelled up each
of the jars and set them out on the sides of each of the tanks. Suman and I put some plastic gloves on, and
started spooning in the sludge into each jar.
The spoons were discarded after use and Opel collected them all in a
rubbish bag. At this point the smell
really wasn’t too bad, it was more a revulsion at the collecting part! The sampling process took about an hour.
Me at the laboratory desk preparing the sampling equipment |
Setting out the jars - three samples were taken from each bed |
Hopefully this will be enough to test |
Taking a sample from the drainage pipe |
Packing the samples on ice to take to Dhaka |
Before
the roofs went back on, I scurried around with my laptop, and downloaded
information from the sensors. I also
tried to use the moisture sensor I’d brought, but the batteries had run down,
and we had to get some replacements from town.
I wasn’t very convinced by the readings I got – one bed may have been
clearly more liquidy than another, but the sensor was saying that it had a
lower VWC (volumetric water content). I
suspect this may be because they are all >85% moisture and it’s confusing
the sensor. Once they dry out a bit,
I’ll re-try.
I
spent the remainder of the afternoon creating some pretty graphs of the initial results and
trying to send a few emails on the rather limited internet connection here.
No comments:
Post a Comment